<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Internet Explorer Inefficiencies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stcroixblog.massagestcroix.com/rants/internet-explorer-inefficiencies/18/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stcroixblog.massagestcroix.com/rants/internet-explorer-inefficiencies/18</link>
	<description>Island news and reviews, a residential perspective</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://stcroixblog.massagestcroix.com/rants/internet-explorer-inefficiencies/18#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 13:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://74.220.215.201/~massages/stcroixblog/?p=18#comment-6</guid>
		<description>I can understand that. I still keep a copy of explorer for those situations, but typically use the Mozilla suite or FireFox for most of my browsing and webwork. If I encounter a site that only runs on explorer I'll open it up.  But I'm finding that as more consumers utilize the better browsers, less sites are limiting themselves to IE.

For instance, I use VistaPrint for business cards and some other business printing needs.  Many of their on-line editing features were limited to Internet Explorer, and moreover, to an IE version not availble for Mac, my platform of choice. So to edit my docs, I had to use IE on a PC somewhere.  Now I can do most, if not all of my editing in the browser of my choice on either platform.

I think of it like the Sony Beta tragedy. Beta was a superior product, but VHS manufacturers established better early market positions.  Sony finally succumbed and adopted VHS and Beta went the way of the dinosaur. So, as consumers, we can let Microsoft dominate the browser market, and forever be using a crappy product, or we can use the better product whenever we can and hope the financial sites and others will catch on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can understand that. I still keep a copy of explorer for those situations, but typically use the Mozilla suite or FireFox for most of my browsing and webwork. If I encounter a site that only runs on explorer I&#8217;ll open it up.  But I&#8217;m finding that as more consumers utilize the better browsers, less sites are limiting themselves to IE.</p>
<p>For instance, I use VistaPrint for business cards and some other business printing needs.  Many of their on-line editing features were limited to Internet Explorer, and moreover, to an IE version not availble for Mac, my platform of choice. So to edit my docs, I had to use IE on a PC somewhere.  Now I can do most, if not all of my editing in the browser of my choice on either platform.</p>
<p>I think of it like the Sony Beta tragedy. Beta was a superior product, but VHS manufacturers established better early market positions.  Sony finally succumbed and adopted VHS and Beta went the way of the dinosaur. So, as consumers, we can let Microsoft dominate the browser market, and forever be using a crappy product, or we can use the better product whenever we can and hope the financial sites and others will catch on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reggie</title>
		<link>http://stcroixblog.massagestcroix.com/rants/internet-explorer-inefficiencies/18#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Reggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 09:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://74.220.215.201/~massages/stcroixblog/?p=18#comment-5</guid>
		<description>The problem I have had with using alterative browsers is their functioning stops when using financial websites that require high security. Many times these financial sites are written only for Explorer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem I have had with using alterative browsers is their functioning stops when using financial websites that require high security. Many times these financial sites are written only for Explorer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
